Businesses as Market-Makers - How Commitments and Narratives Shape Competitive Space
Sixth in The Pivot Mind “How to Thrive in a Changing World” Series
Most businesses operate under the assumption that markets already exist. They believe their job is to compete within a fixed space—identifying customer demand, refining operations, and optimizing performance. This assumption creates a reactive posture, one in which success depends on agility, efficiency, and speed. But the terrain they are responding to is not fixed. It is shaped by human intention. Markets are not just there to be discovered; they are brought into being through commitments, structures, and language. The strongest businesses do not simply compete within markets. They shape the markets themselves. They do so not by dominating their categories, but by disclosing a different reality—one that reorganizes what others believe is valuable, viable, or even possible.
The strongest businesses do not simply compete within markets. They shape the markets themselves.
This is not a matter of messaging. It’s a structural reality. What counts as necessary or inevitable is not dictated solely by demand. It is framed by how businesses define what matters—through what they prioritize, how they act, and what they bring into the world through their decisions. In this sense, business leadership is not just about vision and execution. It is about authorship. It is about becoming a source of coherence in a world of flux, revealing futures that are not yet visible to others.
Tesla didn’t just manufacture electric vehicles. It committed to a future in which electric mobility was not a compromise but an aspiration. That commitment preceded the market’s validation. It was not grounded in demand but in a belief about what needed to exist. In making that commitment, Tesla didn’t merely differentiate its product; it helped restructure the logic of an entire industry. Apple’s commitment to simplicity and design did the same. It didn’t wait for users to demand elegant digital experiences. It made elegance indispensable—redefining not only what consumers expected but what competitors had to deliver.
These commitments are not branding exercises. They are structuring acts. When a business commits to a future not yet confirmed, it begins to perceive and act differently. It orients its operations, talent, messaging, and strategic decisions around that commitment. It starts to see openings others ignore. And if that commitment is sustained—through friction, doubt, and early-stage ambiguity—it begins to influence how the market itself behaves. Competitors recalibrate. Customers shift their expectations. Investors begin to ask new questions. The market, slowly at first, then all at once, reorients itself around a new possibility.
But commitment alone is not enough. For a new future to take hold, it must be rendered legible. And that means it must be named. Language makes value visible. It creates the space in which new perceptions can emerge. Without the right vocabulary, new possibilities remain invisible. This is why market-making is not only a function of innovation or execution. It is a function of narrative.
Revealing the Market Through Language
Every market operates within a dominant narrative—a story about what matters, how value is created, and what success looks like. These stories are rarely questioned, yet they structure how customers behave, how companies position themselves, and how industries evolve. When a business introduces a different story—one grounded in its commitments—it begins to reveal a different market.
Spotify redefined music consumption not by offering more songs, but by changing the story—from ownership to access, from collecting to experiencing. Salesforce reframed enterprise software as a living service rather than a static product, changing how companies buy, use, and update their systems. These shifts did not result from better marketing. They resulted from the clear articulation of a new reality—one that had to be narrated into being before it could be accepted.
Narratives like these do not emerge in isolation. They are shaped by context, but they also reshape that context. The right story at the right moment doesn’t simply explain a shift—it becomes the reason others shift. Amazon’s emphasis on fulfillment and logistical dominance didn’t just differentiate it. It created a gravitational pull that made those attributes the new baseline. Legacy retailers weren’t just outperformed. They were redefined by the space Amazon made visible.
They are not simply first movers. They are meaning-makers. They are builders of context.
This is the heart of narrative as infrastructure. A business’s story is not a final flourish. It is the organizing principle of how it moves, how it coordinates, and how it structures meaning for others. A coherent narrative aligns teams internally, signals direction to partners, attracts talent, and invites customers into a worldview. It becomes the space in which future action makes sense.
This is why clarity matters more than speed. Businesses that wait for confirmation often arrive too late. Those who move too quickly without narrative coherence lose traction. But those who act with clarity—rooted in commitment and expressed through language—create futures that feel inevitable in hindsight. They are not simply first movers. They are meaning-makers. They are builders of context.
The work of leadership, then, is not only to decide but to reveal. The best leaders don’t merely chase opportunity. They create the conditions in which opportunity becomes visible to others. And they do so through the combined force of conviction and articulation—of standing for something and speaking it clearly enough that others can respond, align, and act.
The market does not reward action alone. It rewards coherence. Businesses that understand this do not just compete. They configure. They give others a language for what matters and a path to move forward. They don’t simply fill a gap—they change the shape of the playing field itself.
And so the real strategic question is not: How do we win within this market? The deeper question is: What kind of market are we revealing through how we speak, how we act, and what we choose to build?
Deeper Dive: Suggested Readings
Clayton Christensen, *The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail* (1997).
Jeffrey C. Alexander, The Performance of Politics: Obama's Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power (2010).
Rita McGrath, Seeing Around Corners: How to Spot Inflection Points in Business Before They Happen (2019).
Donald Miller, Building a StoryBrand: Clarify Your Message So Customers Will Listen (2017).
Virgil Henry Storr, Understanding the Culture of Markets (2013)
Next up:
Businesses that shape markets do more than compete. They reveal. They disclose unseen value, structure new expectations, and reconfigure what the world believes is possible. But this work—of seeing, naming, and building—is not limited to commerce. It is the work of leadership itself. And at its deepest level, it is the work of society.
In the final paper, Wisdom, Grace, and Society, we step beyond the market to ask: What does it take to build a world that endures? What kind of leadership sustains not just innovation, but institutions? And how might wisdom and grace become not just personal virtues or business advantages, but structuring forces for how we live, lead, and build together?
Stay connected:
Subscribe to the Newsletter, follow me on LinkedIn, or follow The Pivot Mind for future essays.
Use this link to share with your network:
thepivotmind.com/blog/rethinking-change-and-thriving
With gratitude and anticipation,
John Henderson
Founder, The Pivot Mind